Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
High-quality BGISEQ bulk RNA-seq with excellent read depth (100bp, 69M reads) and strong base composition (92.4% Q30), moderated by moderate duplication at 45.53%; duplication profile suggests potential PCR bias in library amplification. Suitable for gene-level expression profiling but consider duplication filtering for sensitive transcript-level studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0