← Dataset search
SRR10153369
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Aerococcus mictus
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
115349859
reported
total reads
281096
reported
n content pct
0.087
measured
pct q20 bases
97.9
measured
pct q30 bases
97
measured
gc content pct
43
measured
mean read length
205
measured
mean base quality
37.4
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
13.32
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 96/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
97
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
13.32
measured
×0.5
83%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
14 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0