← Dataset search
SRR10153377
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Corynebacterium amycolatum
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
82601658
reported
total reads
170471
reported
n content pct
0.007
measured
pct q20 bases
95.6
measured
pct q30 bases
93
measured
gc content pct
58.7
measured
mean read length
242.2
measured
mean base quality
35.9
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
8.49
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
93
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
8.49
measured
×0.5
99%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
14 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0