SRR1015529

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

94/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk short-read RNA-seq with well-controlled technical duplicates (25.37%) but Q30 bases at 86.9% represent the primary constraint (weight 1.0, scored 84/100) for base-call precision. High read count (20.76M) and clean adapters (0.01%) support reliable abundance quantification. Recommended for reuse in standard workflows.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Acromyrmex echinatior

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3736742040 reported

total reads 20759678 reported

n content pct 0.005 measured

pct q20 bases 93.8 measured

pct q30 bases 86.9 measured

gc content pct 39.9 measured

mean read length 90 measured

mean base quality 34.6 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 25.37 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 94/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 86.9 measured ×1 85%

mean base quality 34.6 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 25.37 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 32 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0