Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
70/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Moderate-quality 454 pyrosequencing RNA-seq with inherently lower Q30 coverage (75.6%) typical of the platform, offset by long read length (355.9bp) and low duplication (8.29%); usable for transcript assembly and novel isoform discovery but error rates require careful post-processing and filtering to avoid spurious variants in downstream analysis.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0