Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR10164005

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Human amplicon on MiSeq with only 59k reads and 145.9 bp length at perfect 100% Q20 and Q30 represents minimal-scale, ultra-high-confidence target sequencing. The 41.5% GC and exceptional basecall accuracy suggest clinical or diagnostic validation; suitable for confirming rare mutations or validating single-sample hypothesis-driven studies.

Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 17362291 reported
total reads 59478 reported
n content pct 0.104 measured
pct q20 bases 100 measured
pct q30 bases 100 measured
gc content pct 41.5 measured
mean read length 145.9 measured
mean base quality 30 measured
adapter content pct 0.05 measured
duplication rate pct 97.12 measured
mean target coverage 0.3 extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 100 measured ×1 100%
adapter content pct 0.05 measured ×0.5 100%
QC cost 2 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 89