SRR1025184

ENA first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

19/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina miRNA-seq; grade F, unsuitable for reuse. Poor base quality (Q30=61%, mean BQ=27.6) and extreme duplication (68.84%) critically undermine miRNA detection sensitivity and expression quantification accuracy.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer II

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 298229470 reported

total reads 8520842 reported

n content pct 0.021 measured

pct q20 bases 86.7 measured

pct q30 bases 61 measured

gc content pct 50.7 measured

mean read length 35 measured

mean base quality 27.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 68.84 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 19/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 61 measured ×1 0%

mean base quality 27.6 measured ×0.6 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 68.84 measured ×0.4 14%

QC cost 42 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0