SRR10253163

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

64/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Drosophila yakuba whole-genome sequencing from HiSeq 2000 producing ~32.3M reads with moderate quality (Q30: 84.5%), suitable for variant discovery but with some caution near low-quality regions. The 49.8% GC is appropriate for Drosophila.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Drosophila yakuba

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 6463301600 reported

total reads 32316508 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 94 measured

pct q30 bases 84.5 measured

gc content pct 49.8 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 36.1 measured

adapter content pct 2.16 measured

duplication rate pct 32.12 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 64/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 84.5 measured ×1 73%

duplication rate pct 32.12 measured ×0.5 25%

adapter content pct 2.16 measured ×0.4 92%

QC cost 37 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0