← Dataset search
SRR10286934
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
56/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
22008018064
reported
total reads
72874232
reported
mean coverage
7.1
extrapolated
n content pct
0.002
measured
pct q20 bases
94.1
measured
pct q30 bases
87.6
measured
gc content pct
44
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
37
measured
adapter content pct
0.81
measured
duplication rate pct
10.41
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 56/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
7.1
extrapolated
×1.2
0%
pct q30 bases
87.6
measured
×1
88%
duplication rate pct
10.41
measured
×0.5
93%
adapter content pct
0.81
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
29 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0