SRR10291841

SRA first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

36/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Scytodes WGS with critical base quality deficiency (Grade F, 36/100). Q30 at 53.8% is the dominant failing metric, far below the ~90% threshold required for reliable SNP calling and assembly. Low base quality will produce incorrect variants and fragmented assemblies; not suitable for reuse.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Scytodes

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 680660110 reported

total reads 2783689 reported

n content pct 0.025 measured

pct q20 bases 66.4 measured

pct q30 bases 53.8 measured

gc content pct 46.3 measured

mean read length 118 measured

mean base quality 28 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 21.6 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 36/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 53.8 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 21.6 measured ×0.5 57%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 1 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0