SRR10291842

SRA first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

26/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Pimoa breviata WGS with the poorest base quality in this batch (Grade F, 26/100). Q30 at 60.1% is the dominant failing metric and completely fails WGS standards, producing unreliable variant calls and fragmented assemblies. Not suitable for reuse.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Pimoa breviata

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 472056275 reported

total reads 1929200 reported

n content pct 0.015 measured

pct q20 bases 74.3 measured

pct q30 bases 60.1 measured

gc content pct 40.3 measured

mean read length 112.6 measured

mean base quality 29.5 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 33.52 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 26/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 60.1 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 33.52 measured ×0.5 20%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 1 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0