SRR10291844

SRA first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

36/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Patu WGS with insufficient base quality for assembly (Grade F, 36/100). Q30 at 51.8% is critically low and the dominant failure metric, far below assembly thresholds. Genome assembly and variant accuracy will be severely compromised; unsuitable for reuse.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Patu

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 442595372 reported

total reads 1809934 reported

n content pct 0.015 measured

pct q20 bases 64.5 measured

pct q30 bases 51.8 measured

gc content pct 41.7 measured

mean read length 117.9 measured

mean base quality 27.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 21.36 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 36/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 51.8 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 21.36 measured ×0.5 58%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 1 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0