SRR10291845

SRA first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

43/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Whole-genome sequencing from Paraplectanoides crassipes with substandard base quality (72.6% Q30) and minimal sequencing depth (2.4M reads), limiting genotype accuracy and variant calling sensitivity; recommend resequencing for reliable genomic analysis.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Paraplectanoides crassipes

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 581958427 reported

total reads 2377379 reported

n content pct 0.031 measured

pct q20 bases 82 measured

pct q30 bases 72.6 measured

gc content pct 43.9 measured

mean read length 120.4 measured

mean base quality 32.1 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 22.1 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 43/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 72.6 measured ×1 13%

duplication rate pct 22.1 measured ×0.5 56%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 1 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0