← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Diaphorina citri
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
7815270300
reported
total reads
26050901
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
97.1
measured
pct q30 bases
92.3
measured
gc content pct
39.4
measured
mean read length
150
measured
mean base quality
35.7
measured
adapter content pct
1.11
measured
duplication rate pct
43.28
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 95/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
92.3
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
35.7
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
1.11
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
43.28
measured
×0.4
71%
QC cost
24 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0