SRR10353321

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

97/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

High-quality bulk RNA-seq with outstanding base metrics (93.4% Q30, zero N content, mean Q=37.6) and minimal adapter content (0.1%), limited only by moderate duplication at 37.85%; duplication will modestly reduce sensitivity for low-abundance transcript detection but will not preclude reliable expression profiling or splicing analysis.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Nilaparvata lugens

Instrument

HiSeq X Ten

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 6483853200 reported

total reads 21612844 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 97.5 measured

pct q30 bases 93.4 measured

gc content pct 39 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 37.6 measured

adapter content pct 0.1 measured

duplication rate pct 37.85 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 97/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93.4 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 37.6 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.1 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 37.85 measured ×0.4 83%

QC cost 27 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0