SRR1035615

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

32/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk short-read RNA-seq with poor basecall quality (Q30=74.4%, mean Q=29.5) and devastating technical duplication at 84.09%, both scoring 0/100 and rendering the dataset essentially unusable. Old platform (Genome Analyzer), short reads (35 bp), and extreme bias indicate failed library or depletion. Not recommended for reuse.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Apis mellifera

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 371654010 reported

total reads 10618686 reported

n content pct 0.124 measured

pct q20 bases 92.3 measured

pct q30 bases 74.4 measured

gc content pct 54.4 measured

mean read length 35 measured

mean base quality 29.5 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 84.09 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 32/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 74.4 measured ×1 22%

mean base quality 29.5 measured ×0.6 25%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 84.09 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0