SRR10377316

ENA first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

47/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Oxford Nanopore long-read WGS; grade F, unsuitable without error-correction. Critically low base quality (Q30=1.1%, Q20=21.2%) reflects inherent nanopore error modes and requires extensive computational polishing, limiting utility for assemblies requiring high per-base accuracy.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Eriobotrya japonica

Instrument

PromethION

Platform

OXFORD_NANOPORE

Read type

long-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 100097556953 reported

total reads 6198187 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 21.2 measured

pct q30 bases 1.1 measured

gc content pct 37.2 measured

mean read length 9655.5 measured

mean base quality 13.2 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 47/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 1.1 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 17 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0