Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
150bp short-read bulk RNA-seq from Apolygus lucorum at excellent quality (grade A, score 99/100). Measured Q30 at 91.4% and mean base quality 37.0 ensure reliable basecalls; measured duplication at 31.62% (scored 96/100) is the only score limiter, with longer reads providing superior mapping specificity.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0