Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
85/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
WGS (Canis lupus familiaris, 290M reads) with grade B (85/100), constrained by duplication_rate_pct=26.71 (measured, scoring 42/100) from standard genomic DNA library prep; Q30=94.3% and mean base quality=39 both score 100/100 (measured). Duplication is acceptable for variant calling; large depth and long reads (151bp) support genome-wide applications.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0