Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
RNA-Seq (Aedes aegypti) achieving perfect grade A (100/100) with exemplary metrics across all dimensions: Q30=96.6%, mean base quality=36.9, low duplication (17.31%, all measured), minimal adapter (0.12%, measured), and large depth (16.7M reads, 101bp length). Ideal dataset for reuse in any expression-based application.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0