Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read RNA-seq of Drosophila miranda on HiSeq 2000 delivering ~2.5 billion bases at 94.5% Q20, enabling comparative transcriptomics to resolve gene expression divergence in this non-model species; the high GC content (49.5%) and short-read limitation restrict isoform assembly but support mapping-based differential expression analysis.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0