SRR1055022

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Short-read bulk RNA-seq from Drosophila miranda at excellent quality (grade A). Measured Q30 bases at 92.7% and mean base quality of 36.7 drive the high grade, ensuring strong basecall accuracy essential for expression quantification. Duplication at 26.72% remains acceptable for downstream work.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Drosophila miranda

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1793850400 reported

total reads 17938504 reported

n content pct 0.021 measured

pct q20 bases 95.7 measured

pct q30 bases 92.7 measured

gc content pct 47.6 measured

mean read length 50 measured

mean base quality 36.7 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 26.72 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92.7 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36.7 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 26.72 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 7 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0