SRR1055043

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

RNA-Seq (Drosophila pseudoobscura, 18M reads) with near-perfect grade A (99/100), limited only by duplication_rate_pct=32.58 (measured, scoring 94/100); Q30=90.7% and mean base quality=36 both score 100/100. Very large, well-executed dataset with manageable duplication; excellent for expression quantification and comparative reuse.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Drosophila pseudoobscura

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1811690000 reported

total reads 18116900 reported

n content pct 0.058 measured

pct q20 bases 94.3 measured

pct q30 bases 90.7 measured

gc content pct 45.1 measured

mean read length 50 measured

mean base quality 36 measured

adapter content pct 0.02 measured

duplication rate pct 32.58 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 90.7 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.02 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 32.58 measured ×0.4 94%

QC cost 38 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0