SRR1055089

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Drosophila pseudoobscura bulk RNA-seq from HiSeq 2000 generating ~11.5M reads with moderate quality (Q30: 91.5%, Q20: 95%), suitable for relative expression work though some concern for lower-abundance transcripts. The 44.1% GC is typical for Drosophila.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Drosophila pseudoobscura

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1146682900 reported

total reads 11466829 reported

n content pct 0.045 measured

pct q20 bases 95 measured

pct q30 bases 91.5 measured

gc content pct 44.1 measured

mean read length 50 measured

mean base quality 36.3 measured

adapter content pct 0.02 measured

duplication rate pct 29.73 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 91.5 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36.3 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.02 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 29.73 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0