SRR1055525

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

92/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Ostrinia nubilalis RNA-seq on HiSeq 2000 delivering 2.4 billion bases at excellent quality (97.7% Q20) with 0.001% N-content, supporting comprehensive gene expression analysis in this crop pest; low GC content (35.8%) is consistent with organism biology.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Ostrinia nubilalis

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2389643046 reported

total reads 46855746 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 97.7 measured

pct q30 bases 93.6 measured

gc content pct 35.8 measured

mean read length 51 measured

mean base quality 36.8 measured

adapter content pct 0.23 measured

duplication rate pct 52.2 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 92/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93.6 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36.8 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.23 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 52.2 measured ×0.4 51%

QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0