← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Oryza sativa Japonica Group
Instrument
GridION
Platform
OXFORD_NANOPORE
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
12.51
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
57273551
reported
total reads
7996
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
4.9
measured
sampled bases
56356927
measured
sampled reads
7890
measured
gc content pct
45.7
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
11847.9
measured
read length max
90825
measured
read length min
5
measured
read length n50
24771
measured
max base quality
28
measured
mean read length
7142.8
measured
max n pct per pos
0
measured
mean base quality
8.1
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
42.97
measured
read length median
225
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
2.4
measured
duplication rate pct
3.83
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.28
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
duplication rate pct
3.83
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
23 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0