← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
71/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Oryza sativa Japonica Group
Instrument
GridION
Platform
OXFORD_NANOPORE
Read type
long-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
9.63
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
137928549
reported
total reads
8000
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
10.2
measured
sampled bases
54962099
measured
sampled reads
3174
measured
gc content pct
43.9
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
16110.8
measured
read length max
98752
measured
read length min
5
measured
read length n50
30040
measured
max base quality
28
measured
mean read length
17316.4
measured
max n pct per pos
0
measured
mean base quality
10.1
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
19
measured
read length median
14606.5
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
9.6
measured
duplication rate pct
0.98
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.16
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 71/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
read length n50
30040
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
10.1
measured
×0.8
1%
duplication rate pct
0.98
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
48 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0