Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Anopheles gambiae RNA-seq on NextSeq 550 reaching 39.6 billion bases with exceptional quality metrics (95.5% Q20, 0.002% N-content), enabling deep malaria vector transcriptomics for studying infection responses, sex differences, or tissue-specific expression at high sensitivity; suitable for detecting low-abundance isoforms and subtle expression shifts.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0