Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
RNA-Seq with grade A (98/100), limited only by duplication_rate_pct=34.77 (measured, scoring 89/100); Q30=98.2% and mean base quality=39 are both perfect (measured). Low duplication despite 50bp platform chemistry, minimal adapter (0.09%), and excellent base quality make this dataset highly suitable for reuse.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0