Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Genome Analyzer IIx RNA-seq from Aedes aegypti generated 1.4M reads across 145M bases with good Q-scores (95.6% Q20, 91.3% Q30) but limited depth. The 44.9% GC is normal. Reuse for targeted expression studies of highly expressed genes is possible; caveat that shallow coverage and legacy platform preclude comprehensive transcriptome quantitation.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0