Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
71/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Genome Analyzer IIx bulk RNA-seq from Aedes aegypti generated only ~613k short reads (61 million bases, 78.8% Q30), very limited depth with borderline quality (88% Q20). This undersized dataset restricts reliable genome-wide expression profiling and transcriptome coverage. Reuse is best reserved for validating candidate genes or as a mapping control; broader comparative studies require additional samples.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0