Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Genome Analyzer IIx RNA-seq from Aedes aegypti generated 2.3M reads spanning 234M bases with 99.4% Q20 and 97.9% Q30, maintaining high per-base quality despite limited sequencing throughput. The 47.7% GC is normal for mosquitoes. Reuse for targeted gene-expression validation is feasible; caveat that platform constraints and shallow coverage preclude comprehensive transcriptomics or detailed isoform analysis.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0