Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Genome Analyzer IIx RNA-seq from Aedes aegypti produced 2M reads across 203M bases with 99.3% Q20 and 97.9% Q30, showing exceptional per-base quality despite minimal read depth from this early sequencer. The 45.5% GC is expected. Reuse for targeted-gene expression studies is feasible; caveat that very shallow coverage and platform age limit transcriptome-wide applicability.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0