Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Genome Analyzer IIx bulk RNA-seq from Aedes aegypti generates ~887k short reads (88.7 million bases, 84.3% Q30), shallow coverage with moderate quality concerns. This undersized dataset is restricted to validating high-abundance transcripts or candidate genes; genome-wide profiling is unreliable. Reuse requires pooling with other samples or focusing on pre-defined gene sets for robust expression quantification in Aedes.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0