Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina Genome Analyzer II bulk RNA-seq from Aedes albopictus comprises 10.7 million short reads totaling 533 million bases at exceptional quality (99.4% ≥Q20, 97.3% ≥Q30). The zero N content and 48.3% GC composition indicate very clean sequencing. The moderate read depth enables basic transcriptome analysis and gene expression profiling in this disease vector mosquito.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0