← Dataset search
SRR10727904
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
72/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Enterococcus faecium
Instrument
NextSeq 500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
422104520
reported
total reads
1507790
reported
n content pct
0.017
measured
pct q20 bases
93.2
measured
pct q30 bases
89.2
measured
gc content pct
36.5
measured
mean read length
139.9
measured
mean base quality
33.5
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
45.89
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 72/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
89.2
measured
×1
96%
duplication rate pct
45.89
measured
×0.5
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
29 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0