Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2500 bulk RNA-seq from Butorides striata generates 52.2 million short reads totaling 5.2 billion bases at very high quality (97.8% ≥Q20, 95.3% ≥Q30). The minimal N content and notably high 54.5% GC composition are distinctive. The substantial read count enables robust gene expression quantification and comprehensive transcriptome profiling in this bird species.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0