Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2500 bulk RNA-seq from Phaethornis ruber comprises 66 million short reads totaling 6.6 billion bases at exceptional quality (98.9% ≥Q20, 96% ≥Q30). The minimal N content and 48.2% GC composition indicate high-quality sequencing. The very substantial read depth enables comprehensive transcriptome profiling and sensitive detection of gene expression changes in this hummingbird species.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0