Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
60/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2000 bulk RNA-seq from Aedes aegypti comprises 82.1 million short reads totaling 8.8 billion bases at moderate quality (82.6% ≥Q20, 76.9% ≥Q30). The notably high N content (2.443%) is markedly unusual and indicates significant quality issues with this run. The high read count partially compensates, but the elevated N content requires conservative downstream filtering and limits utility for sensitive gene expression analysis.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0