SRR11050210

SRA first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

74/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

NextSeq 500 bulk RNA-seq from the legume Senna tora (~19.8 million reads, ~2.6 billion bases, 80.1% Q30). Moderate base quality is usable but below typical standards; apply aggressive quality trimming before alignment. Better suited for gene-level expression estimates than sensitive isoform or variant analysis.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Senna tora

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2557461104 reported

total reads 19836753 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 90.8 measured

pct q30 bases 80.1 measured

gc content pct 45.5 measured

mean read length 131.4 measured

mean base quality 32.7 measured

adapter content pct 0.14 measured

duplication rate pct 12.09 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 74/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 80.1 measured ×1 51%

mean base quality 32.7 measured ×0.6 78%

adapter content pct 0.14 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 12.09 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 34 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0