Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
65/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx bulk RNA-seq from Drosophila simulans comprises 16.1 million short reads totaling 1.2 billion bases at good quality (96.2% ≥Q20, 79.9% ≥Q30). The notably elevated N content (0.06%) is unusual for Illumina; 46.1% GC is typical. The moderate read depth enables gene expression profiling in this Drosophila species.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0