Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2500 bulk RNA-seq from the hornworm Manduca sexta yields ~8.95 million short reads (1.12 billion bases, 95.1% Q30), moderate to good coverage enabling transcript abundance profiling in this Lepidoptera model. This dataset supports differential expression studies and detection of moderate to abundant genes. Bulk sequencing lacks cell-type specificity; reuse suits tissue-level or developmental transcriptomic studies of insect biology and metabolism.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0