Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
BGISEQ-500 miRNA-seq from Aedes albopictus yields ~22.7 million short reads (598 million bases, 94% Q30), high coverage ideal for profiling microRNA expression in this invasive mosquito vector. This dataset enables detection of abundant and moderate miRNAs and comparative miRNA studies. miRNA-seq enriches for small RNAs rather than whole transcriptome; reuse suits functional studies of post-transcriptional gene regulation in Aedes albopictus.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0