Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2500 bulk RNA-seq from Apis mellifera carnica comprises 26.9 million short reads totaling 2.7 billion bases at moderate quality (74.3% ≥Q20, 59.2% ≥Q30). The minimal N content and 38.4% GC composition indicate lower base quality than typical. The substantial read count partially compensates, enabling basic gene expression profiling in this honeybee subspecies with appropriate quality filtering.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0