Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
86/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2500 bulk RNA-seq profiles Apis mellifera carnica from 28.7 million short reads totaling 2.9 billion bases at good quality (94.1% ≥Q20, 89.6% ≥Q30). The notably elevated N content (0.02%) is slightly unusual; 39.3% GC is typical. The substantial read depth enables gene expression profiling in this honeybee subspecies.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0