Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NextSeq 500 bulk RNA-seq from Aedes aegypti generates ~2.17 million short reads (328 million bases, 95.4% Q30), limited coverage but good quality for focused studies. This undersized dataset restricts genome-wide expression profiling. Reuse is best for validating known genes; combining with deeper samples strengthens comparative transcriptomic conclusions.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0