Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NextSeq 500 bulk RNA-seq from Aedes aegypti generates ~3.23 million short reads (487 million bases, 95.6% Q30), limited coverage but good quality for focused studies. This undersized dataset restricts genome-wide expression profiling. Reuse suits validation of candidate genes in the disease vector; combining with deeper samples enhances transcriptomic power.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0