Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
72/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Genome Analyzer II bulk RNA-seq from Mastigoproctus giganteus yields ~26 million short reads (3.64 billion bases, 84.6% Q30), good coverage but with lower quality requiring consideration. This dataset enables transcript abundance profiling and differential expression studies in this whip scorpion. Bulk sequencing lacks cell-type specificity; reuse suits tissue-level or developmental transcriptomic studies of arachnid biology.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0