Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
AB 5500xl (ABI SOLiD) WGS from Apis mellifera yields only ~2.04 million short reads (153 million bases, 64.1% Q30), very low quality with 0% GC content annotation (likely data artifact). This colorspace SOLiD dataset is obsolete platform-wise and severely limited in utility. Reuse is not recommended; modern Illumina or long-read approaches are far superior for any honeybee genomics.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0