Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2500 bulk RNA-seq from Polypedilum vanderplanki (chironomid fly) yields ~9.02 million short reads (459 million bases, 98.4% Q30), moderate coverage at exceptional quality enabling reliable transcript detection. This dataset supports differential expression analysis and detection of moderately-expressed genes. Bulk sequencing lacks cell-type specificity; reuse suits tissue-level or developmental transcriptomic studies of this desiccation-tolerant organism.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0